Posterous Alternatives?

So, Posterous is shutting down at the end of the month. It was a great meta-poster. Anyone know any suitable alternatives. Really liked having it for replicating my technical ramblings across multiple sites (really helpful when you work at multiple job-sites, each with their own web-filter rule-sets).

Looking for any recommendations - maybe even paid-for services.

The "Which LUN Is That" Game

One of the fun things about SAN storage has to do with its tendency to be multipathed. Different operating systems handle this differently - but most of the ones I've worked with tend to do what I refer to as "ghosting".

"Ghosting" is, by no means, a technical term. It's mostly meant to convey that, when an OS sees a device down multiple paths, it sees the device multiple times. While you may only have one actual chunk of storage presented from your SAN to your host, you might see that chunk 2, 3, 4 or more times in your storage listings. I call these "extra" presences in the output "ghosts".

At any rate, one of the joys associated with ghosting is determining, "am I seeing all of the LUNs I expect to see and am I seeing each of them an appropriate number of times. If you're only presenting one chunk of storage down four paths and you see four copies of the LUN show up, it's easy enough to say, "yep: things look right". It's even easy(ish) when you have multiple chunks of different-sized chunks of storage to determine if things are right: 1) you have PATHsxLUNs number of storage chunks visible; 2) each set of chunks is an identifiable size. However, if you're presenting multiple chunks that are the same size or multiple chunks with differing levels of pathing-redundancy, things get a bit trickier.

One of the things I'd sorta liked about Solaris's STMS drivers were, once you'd activated the software for a given LUN, the ghosts disappeared into a single meta-device. For better or worse, not everyone used STMS - particularly not on older Solaris releases or configurations that used things like EMC's PowerPath or VERITAS's DMP software. PowerPath actually kinda made the problem worse, as, in addition to the normal ghosts, you added a PowerPath meta-device for each group of LUN-paths. This made the output from the `format` command even longer.

All of that aside, how do you easily identify which disks are ghosts of each other and which ones are completely separate LUNS? The most reliable method I've found is looking for the LUNs' serial numbers. If you have eight storge chunks visible, four of which have one serial number and four of which have a different serial number, you know that you've got two LUNs presented to your host and that each is visible down four paths. But how do you get the serial numbers?

Disks' and LUNs' serial numbers are generally found in their SCSI inquiry responses in what's referred to as "code page 83". How you get to that information is highly OS dependent.

• On Solaris - at least prior to Solaris 10 - you didn't generally have good utilities for pulling serial numbers from LUNs. If you wanted to pull that info, you'd have to fire up the `format` utility in "expert" mode, issue the command-sequence "scsi → inquire". By default, this dumps out code page 83 as part of the response. It dumps this info in two parts: a big, multi-line block of hex-codes and a smaller multi-line block of ASCII text. Your disk/LUN serial number is found by ignorg the big, multiline block of hex values and looking at the third line from the smaller ASCII block.
• On Linux, they provide you a nice little tool that allows you to directly dump out the target SCSI inquiry code-page. Its default behavior is pretty much to dump just the serial number (actually, the serial number is embedded in a longer string, but if you send that string over to your SAN guys, they'll generally recognize the relevant substring and match it up to what they've presented to your host). The way you dump out that string is to use the command `scsi_id -ugs /block/sdX` (where "sdX" is something like "sda", "sdh", etc.).

At any rate, multi-pathing software and associated utilities aside, once you've determined which serial numbers correspond to which disk device-nodes, it because a trivial exercise to determine "am I seeing all of the LUNs I expect to see" and "are my LUNs presented down the expected number of SAN-fabric paths".

Note: if you're running Solaris 10 or an earlier Solaris release with appropriate storage device management packages installed, you may have access to tools like `prtpicl`, `luxadm` and `fcinfo` with which to pull similarly-useful pathing information.